On 2015-09-15 19:16:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > readfuncs.c doesn't actually stop to verify that the field name in stored > rules is what it expects.
This reminds me: Is there a reason for that? ISTM that adding checks for the field names would make error messages about borked stored trees much easier to understand? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
