Tatsuo Ishii <is...@sraoss.co.jp> writes: >> I think the correct fix would have been to change "update sequences" >> to "update temporary sequences", not to remove it.
> Not sure. The paragraph tries to explain the difference between read > only transactions and standby. Right, but what I think it is comparing is a read-only transaction on the master and a transaction on the standby. The former can do nextval() on temp sequences, the latter can't. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers