> Right, but what I think it is comparing is a read-only transaction > on the master and a transaction on the standby. The former can do > nextval() on temp sequences, the latter can't.
But we cannot create temp sequences on stanbys in the first place. Still do you think there's value to refer to nextval() on temp sequences here? Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
