On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:53 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2018-Nov-28, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:46:33AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 2018-11-28 18:34:26 +0100, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > > > > After one week no response at all? Neither positive nor negative. It > seems > > > > that the community has little interest in the SVG issue. Or in my > > > > suggestion? > > > > > > I'd suggest describing your proposed workflow in sgml, not a pdf file. > > > > Well, there were a number of images in the PDF that would be harder to > > do in SGML. > > I think the point is how do you integrate the images from the SVG source > into the documentation output. Presumably that won't be PDF, for > example the HTML output will not use a PDF as an image embedded in the > page. It probably works ok for the PDF output (of the whole > documentation) to use the PDF of the image ... I suppose the HTML output > will need a PNG or such. > > If the source is SVG, why not just use SVG? SVG support in browsers has to be pushing 10 years now, shouldn't be a problem at all... And SVG can be embedded in the HTML itself (whether that would work in this particular case I don't know, but in theory it can) -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>