On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object > refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to > "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the > intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs. > Any thoughts from others?
Actually, looking around we use connection_name for other commands like EXEC SQL or DISCONNECT, so renaming connection_object to connection_name makes the documentation more consistent. And done. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
