> On 1 Dec 2020, at 13:39, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> The attached patch adds ulinks for all >> RFC's and marks subsequent mentions as acronym to make the docs consistent. >> It >> also spells all as "RFC <number>" with a whitespace as that was the most >> commonly used spelling (there is no RFC for how to reference to an RFC so >> we're >> free to choose). > > There is RFC 7322, "RFC Style Guide", Section 3.5 Citations > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-3.5). That's for the style used > in RFCs themselves. It recommends "RFC <number>" as well. Interesting, I've looked for that more than once but failed to find that section. Thanks for pointing it out. > Pushed, thanks! Thanks! cheers ./daenil
