On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 02:39:04PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and > > not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have > > some as <acronym> while others are not. > > I'm not sure how sensible the <acronym> tag is for these. I mean, yeah, it's > an acronym, but it wouldn't make sense to write it open. It doesn't seem to > affect the formatting in the HTML docs, at least I don't see any difference > in my browser. But let's be consistent.
Ideally acronyms would use smallcaps, but I don't think we have that configured in our style sheets. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
