On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:40:08PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Which is why the extra email was sent *after* the migration, to make sure > it would be the first one *not* hitting peoples filters, and thus have a > chance of being read even if the others weren't.
That surely didn't work, since the relevant people received that mail after the migration had happened. > So do you have any suggestions for actually fixing that? Given that we have > more lists to migrate, if you can figure out a way to make those changes > without peoples filters not matching, we'd be happy to hear it.. I don't have an answer for that, but I will note that if this migration was announced weeks in advance I certainly missed it. I admit I was busy, but I can't find it in the mail I didn't read yet, either. Maybe a two week heads up that some time in the future the mail is going to change (the same announcement as was sent) would help? A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com
