All, * Alan Hodgson (ahodg...@lists.simkin.ca) wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:52 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > > it seems to *ME* like a simpler solution to the original problem > > would have been to simply STRIP any DKIM out of the original > > messages, and continue to munge headers and footers like mail > > list > > reflectors have been doing for decades. > > That wouldn't help; DMARC policies are based on the From: header. If > you want to munge messages from DMARC-reject senders you need to > replace the From: header with your own. > > Email doesn't work the same as it did decades ago. Senders need to keep > up.
Please, let's take this debate elsewhere, it's not appropriate here. If you'd really like to discuss further, you're welcome to email me directly. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
