On Wednesday, June 6, 2018, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jeremy Schneider <schnj...@amazon.com> writes: > > My main feedback on the CoC is that it doesn't really say anything about > > what to do if the complaint is against a core team member. This was > > mentioned elsewhere in the email thread and I'm a bit surprised there's > > nothing explicit in the CoC. If someone feels they have been treated in > > a grossly inappropriate manner by a core team member, is it worthwhile > > to report this? I think they'd want to know a little more about what the > > process will be for that special case. > > Yeah, somebody else made a similar point upthread. I guess we felt that > the proper procedure was obvious given the structure, but maybe not. > I could support adding text to clarify this, perhaps along the line of > > In the event of a complaint against a CoC committee member, the > process proceeds normally, but that person is excluded from the > committee's discussions in the matter. Similarly, in the event of > a complaint against a core team member, the process proceeds > normally, but that person is excluded from any core review that > may occur. > > and maybe also > > In such cases, removal from the committee or core is another > possible sanction, in addition to those mentioned above. >
Yeah, while it is pretty much self-evident I would agree that stating it explicitly would benefit the document. Both parts. On the topic of privacy - who exactly, from an administrative aspect, has access to the systems that house these kinds of confidential communications? Do these emails end up in PostgreSQL.org servers long-term or is it mainly transient distribution and only individual's personal email accounts, with whatever hosting provider they choose, hold the messages long-term? David J.
