The preceding's pretty simple. An attacker goes after an individual, > presumably without provocation and/or asymetrically. The attacked > person is on this mailing list. IMHO this attacker must choose between > continuing his attacks, and belonging to the Postgres community. > > What's tougher is the person who attacks groups of people. > > The preceding's pretty simple. An "attacker" voices their political opinions or other unorthodoxy or unpopular stance, but in no way directs it at the postgres user base or on a postgres list. The "attacked" person is on this mailing list. IMHO this "attacker" must choose between continuing to voice their opinion, and belonging to the Postgres community.
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Dave Page
- Re: Code of Conduct plan James Keener
- Re: Code of Conduct plan David Wall
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Stephen Frost
- Re: Code of Conduct plan James Keener
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Stephen Frost
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Martin Mueller
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Ilya Kosmodemiansky
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Steve Litt
- Re: Code of Conduct plan James Keener
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Chris Travers
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Bruce Momjian
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Bruce Momjian
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Tom Lane
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Melvin Davidson
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Martin Mueller
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Bruce Momjian
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Martin Mueller
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Tom Lane
- Re: Code of Conduct plan Chris Travers