What counts as foul language has changed a great deal in the last two decades. You could always tie it to what is printable in the New York Times, but that too is changing. I could live with something like “Be considerate, and if you can’t be nice, be at least civil”.
From: Melvin Davidson <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, September 15, 2018 at 11:12 AM To: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>, Chris Travers <[email protected]>, James Keener <[email protected]>, Steve Litt <[email protected]>, "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan How about we just simplify the code of conduct to the following: Any member in the various PostgreSQL lists is expected to maintain respect to others and not use foul language. A variation from the previous sentence shall be considered a violation of the CoC. On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 11:51 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes: > There is a risk that if we adopt a CoC, and nothing happens, and the > committee does nothing, that they will feel like a failure, and get > involved when it was best they did nothing. I think the CoC tries to > address that, but nothing is perfect. Yeah, a busybody CoC committee could do more harm than good. The way the CoC tries to address that is that the committee can't initiate action of its own accord: somebody has to bring it a complaint. Of course, a member of the committee could go out and find a "problem" and then file a complaint --- but then they'd have to recuse themselves from dealing with that complaint, so there's an incentive not to. regards, tom lane -- Melvin Davidson Maj. Database & Exploration Specialist Universe Exploration Command – UXC Employment by invitation only!
