"Jan de Visser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any reason why this couldn't appear in the core of some future
> version?
You didn't read to the end of my post ;-). If a rownum() function
like this didn't have any gotchas, I'd be in favor of putting it in,
but I don't really want to set the behavior in stone just yet.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
