On Sun, September 7, 2008 12:47 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Randal T. Rioux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sat, September 6, 2008 8:21 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ldd or local equivalent might help debug this.
>
>> bash-3.00# ldd /usr/local/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1
>> libc.so.1 => /lib/64/libc.so.1
>> libm.so.2 => /lib/64/libm.so.2
>> /platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
>
> How about ldd on the libssl.so you're using?
We're getting closer...
bash-3.00# ldd /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
libsocket.so.1 => /lib/64/libsocket.so.1
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/64/libnsl.so.1
libdl.so.1 => /lib/64/libdl.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libc.so.1 => /lib/64/libc.so.1
libmp.so.2 => /lib/64/libmp.so.2
libmd.so.1 => /lib/64/libmd.so.1
libscf.so.1 => /lib/64/libscf.so.1
libdoor.so.1 => /lib/64/libdoor.so.1
libuutil.so.1 => /lib/64/libuutil.so.1
libgen.so.1 => /lib/64/libgen.so.1
libm.so.2 => /lib/64/libm.so.2
/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/sparcv9/libmd_psr.so.1
Now why would libssl.so not be linked to libgcc_s.so.1? Why would
PostgreSQL care and not Apache?
Thanks so much for helping me out with this.
Randy
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
