On Sun, Jan 4, 2004 at 4:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Which, not all of it is, at least not from any source I'm aware of. > > Well this list should not be supporting any of the modules that are non > postgresql anyway and I know all the postgresql packages are available in > native format.
pl/java? plDebugger plugin? Yeah, they're not supported here, but if you want them, it doesn't seem unreasonable to use a package that has them. > I don't understand your point. The origin is EnterpriseDB, what does that > matter? Because the packages that are distributed on the PostgreSQL FTP site are also of different origins (the Solaris packages are built by [EMAIL PROTECTED], the Win32 by me (on the same hardware as the one-click installers) and the RPMs by Devrim - and the ability of this list to support them is no different than it is of supporting most of the other packages that are out there. My point is, that being on ftp.postgresql.org doesn't mean anything in terms of our ability to support a given package. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
