On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote: > > I'd be looking at management, reliability, backup, integration into the > rest of the infrastructure, product longevity, support, etc. Performance > you can always throw hardware at.
And given the relatively high costs of a MSSQL installation, you can throw a LOT of hardware at a PostgreSQL server. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
