Thank you all for the suggestion and it's very clear to me now
Regards
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > test=# select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24MI');
> > to_timestamp
> > ------------------------
> > 2011-02-26 14:00:00-08
> > (1 row)
> >
> > Corrected for the ':':
> >
> > test=# select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI');
> > to_timestamp
> > ------------------------
> > 2011-02-26 14:50:00-08
> > (1 row)
> >
> >
> > On 9.0.3 corrected for the ':':
> >
> > test(5432)aklaver=>select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY
> > HH24:MI');
> > to_timestamp
> > ------------------------
> > 2011-02-26 14:50:00-08
> > (1 row)
> >
> >
> > Seems 9.0+ is stricter on its parsing.
>
> Agreed. We have made some cleanups to the to_timestamp code in recent
> major releases and that is what the user must be seeing.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
