> Asia <asia123...@op.pl> writes:
> > I would expect to have only one top-level CA cert in server's and client's 
> > root.crt and it was not possible to configure with 2-level intermediate CA. 
> 
> This seems a little confused, since in your previous message you stated
> that libpq worked correctly and JDBC did not, and now you seem to be
> saying the opposite.
> 
> As far as libpq goes, I would expect it to function correctly in 9.0 and
> up (and it did function correctly, last I tested it).  Previous releases
> will not do this nicely, for lack of this patch:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=4ed4b6c54
> 
>                       regards, tom lane
> 


I apologise then, it seems I was not clear enough when explaining my issue. 

I am using PostgreSQL, version 9.0.

I have all of it (libpq and jdbc) working, however I have some doubts about the 
correctness of my configuration.

The situation is more or less like following:

Client intermediate CA (root.crt): C1 -> C2, Client cert: C1 -> C2 ->C3

Server intermediate CA (root.crt): C1 -> S1, Server Cert: C1 -> S1 -> S2

I always use clientcert=1 in pg_hba to force mutual SSL.

Now with the above configuration libpq connects fine. But when I tried to use 
jdbc it requires me to append client's intermediate CA - "C1 -> C2" 
to server's root.crt. So server's root.crt content looks like follows:

C1 -> S1  ->  C1 -> C2

Then jdbc conenction works fine and the change does not affect libpq - it works 
fine like before.

So my point was general why the behavior for libpq and jdbc driver is not 
common (probably we would need some custom implementation of Java SSL facory 
for PostgreSQL) - both types of connection have different cert configuration 
what I believe could be better when it was common.

And the second issue is that you wrote that it should be enough to put to-level 
CA certs. So I left only C1 in server's root.crt, restarted server
and received following error during connection:

SSL error: certificate verify failed

The question is how to do it correctly?

Please advise.

Kind regards,
Joanna

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to