Le lundi 14 janvier 2013 à 16:35 -0600, Shaun Thomas a écrit : > My personal server is on Debian too, with a similar uptime. But we > recently ran into this guy on our 12.04 Ubuntu systems: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1055222 >
Ha, so you seem to need to use the X windows system, which I do not use on my servers, so I can't speak for that. > Even calling canonical to ask about buying a support contract got us an > automated "We'll contact you within two business days" response, which > isn't exactly ideal. So we're strongly considering RHEL, because at > least they would call us back, and would give us some small amount of > peace knowing we could maybe get some assistance since we don't exactly > have a kernel dev on staff to find things like this. I understand the reasoning; but I wonder : would it make sense for you to pick one of the well known systems mentionned above thread, with a specialist(*) catering to your installation/maintenance needs, and then have another different one as a standby backup, ready to take over in case of need? I'm asking this because I try to find a way out of the 'big corporation only talking to the big corporation' paradigm. (* : typically a linux nerd, with long hair, a beard and shorts, who knows his stuff; not a corporate drone) -- Salutations, Vincent Veyron http://gdlc.fr/logiciels Applications de gestion des sinistres assurances et des contentieux -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
