On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, James B. Byrne <byrn...@harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > On Thu, February 21, 2013 12:38, James B. Byrne wrote: >> I am trying, without success, to create a PG-9.2 database without >> including the plpgsql extension. I have tried specifying template0 >> and the database is nonetheless created with plpgsql. I have deleted >> plpgsql from template1 and the new database is nonetheless created >> with plpgsql. >> >> I desire to remove plpgsql from newly created databases because the >> dump that is generated by pgdump contains this line: >> >> CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS plpgsql WITH SCHEMA pg_catalog; >> > > Wrong line. This is the line > > COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql IS 'PL/pgSQL procedural language'; > > And yes, I went through this a year ago with PG-9.1 and resolved it > once by switching to template0 in the connection configuration. Now it > is back with PG-9.2. using the exact same configuration code because > evidently plpgsql is added regardless.
curious why you want to do this. there was actually some debate back in the day about pros/cons of having pl/pgsql be a built-in feature, which as you can see is where things are going. if you don't mind surgery with a shotgun, you can simply drop the extension after the load resolves. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
