On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqlad...@geoff.dj> wrote:
> On 21 January 2016 at 10:37, Chris Travers <chris.trav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > At the end of the day this will require human judgment rather than > > formulation. > > Then make it explicit. > > * Disruption of the collaborative space, or patterns of behaviour > which the majority of the core team consider to be harassment, will > not be tolerated. > > (I've depersonalised the sentence also, to make it clear that it's the > action and not the actor that is not tolerated) > > > Human judgment may be flawed but in a culturally diverse group it is far > > better than the alternative. > > It's better to let the baying crowd decide your fate rather than > codifying acceptable behaviour? > > The Dark Ages called, they want their Justice model back :) > Resisting the urge to talk about how justice was actually seen in the Dark Ages.... But seriously, I think human judgment is better than a code which those who want to cause problems can and will use as a weapon against the rest. > > Geoff > -- Best Wishes, Chris Travers Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
