On Jan 24, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> In retrospect I revoke my support of this idea entirely. It just isn't our 
> jurisdiction. If doesn't happen in our yard then it isn't our business.

Then know that the current draft of the CoC is easily interpreted as giving 
shelter to abusers.

> I would also note that this document isn't going to be the end all of 
> enforcement. Ultimately -core has the final say. -Core can determine on its 
> own if it wants to enforce against a particular community member (with or 
> without the CoC).

Yep. And as Chrisophe pointed out, none of it will mean anything without an 
explicit and enforced policy for dealing with violations.

Best,

David

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to