On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@visena.com> wrote:
> På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 17:38:04, skrev Joshua D. Drake < > j...@commandprompt.com>: > > On 03/08/2016 08:02 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > > På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 16:57:01, skrev Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>: > > > > Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@visena.com> writes: > > > What I'm looking for is "inverse -b" in an otherwise complete > > dump. Any plans > > > to add that? > > > > [ shrug... ] Nobody ever asked for it before. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > It surely helps testing production-datasets which contain lots of BLOBs > > where one wants to dump the production-data into a test-env. We have > > >1TB databases containing > 95% blobs so it would help us tremendously > > to have this option. > > I have quite a few customers that would benefit from the ability to not > have blobs present in dumps. > > > Great! So how do we proceed to get "--no-blobs" added to pg_dump? > Maybe CommandPrompt and Visena should co-fund development of such an > addition, if it's accepted by -hackers? > We'd be willing to pay for such an addition for the 9.5 branch, as a patch. > Unfortunately this doesn't qualify as a bug fix - it is a new feature and thus is ineligible for inclusion in official 9.5 David J.
