> > 1) Distribution of Linux to have the largest number of "out of the box" > > security holes. Check back and look at the security reports. Count them if > > you insist. > > And check for the number of them being Red Hat specific. I consider things like the portmapper being enabled by default Red Hat specific. > > 3) So much extra crap running to begin with, eating up extra memory, cpu, > > etc. > > You're obviously unfamiliar with it. I don't know, I generaly turn off at least half of the services that are enabled by default, which free up quite a bit of memory. steve ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Philip Molter
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Philip Molter
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Tim Barnard
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- RE: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe
- RE: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Tim Mickol
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- RE: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Tim Mickol
- [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Andreas Tille
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL wsheldah