scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The one thing that should absolutely be turned off is day/month swapping 
> > > on dates of the form: 2003-02-22.
> > 
> > Agreed on that.  YYYY-DD-MM isn't used in the real world AFAIK, and it's
> > reasonable to treat it as an error.
> > 
> > > I've seen little actual defense of the current behaviour,
> > 
> > Other than me, I think you mean.  dd/mm/yyyy and mm/dd/yyyy are
> > inherently ambiguous in the real world, and when you can clearly
> > determine what the intended meaning is, I think it's more reasonable
> > to assume the datestyle isn't set correctly than to reject the data.
> 
> I thought the locale set that kind of behaviour didn't it?  If so, then 
> it's better to fail loudly then quietly accept bad data.  But if the 
> locale doesn't define such a thing, or it can't be set in postgresql.conf, 
> the it's best to just avoid that date style altogether.

Added to TODO, with question mark:

        * Have initdb set DateStyle based on locale?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to