On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Francois Suter wrote: > > why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ? > >> > >> I would suggest that we consider forming a pgsql-competitive email > >> list for > > Whatever, but using another mailing is definitely an excellent idea. I > actually stopped reading -general recently because it got bogged down > in yet another PostgreSQL vs MySQL debate. And the same happens to > advocacy too, although less frequently. > > Then again this means that whoever moderates -general (is that you > Marc?) would have to move PostgreSQL vs MySQL threads to the other > mailing list whenever they crop up, otherwise any benefits will be > lost.
actually, nobody "moderates" any of the lists, except for pgsql-www, and that is only for subscribers ... What it means is that those that are on this list, if they see a tangent tread popping up, need to learn to respond to the correct list, CC'ng in the original poster, so that subsequent responses go to the other list ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
