Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyarray has been defined this way since 7.3 -- any concerns there?
I don't think so --- we weren't trying to use it as an actual column
datatype back then.
7.4 has a problem though :-( ... this is one of the "damn I wish we'd
caught that before release" ones, since it can't easily be fixed without
initdb. Reminds me that I need to get to work on making pg_upgrade
viable again.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
