Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is just a bad case of "nested loops are costed wrong".

Looks to me like a statistical failure.  Why does it think there will be
4000 rows out of that join when there are only 93?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to