Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >>On 30 Nov 2004 22:55:00 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: > >>>Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >>> >>>> Just as an FYI ... the latest RFD is for *one* >>>> comp.databases.postgresql group to be created, that is not-gated ... >>>> this means that those using it would not have the benefit(s) that >>>> those using the pgsql.* hierarchy do, namely access to the wealth of >>>> knowledge/experience of those on the mailing lists ... >>>> >>>> I had posed the 'who would use USENET' question on -hackers previous >>>> to the poll, and the general opinion was "not in this life time" by >>>> ppl like PeterE, TomL, JoshuaD, etc ... the thread can be seen: >>>> >>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg01110.php >>> >>>Trying to sway the vote? > >>There has been no CFV. During an RFD, he's completely entitled to try >>to persuade others people to vote yes or no when the time comes. > >>Bill, is it possible for you to drop the combative tone? It's not >>that helpful to constantly raise the temperature of the discussion. > > Actually, I didn't find Bill's comment 'combative' ... :) Nor was it intended to be that way. :-) -- Bill ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
