Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> That depends. As long as the data is appropriately sync()ed when
> PostgreSQL asks, it should be fine. However, from reading the manpage
> it's not clear if fsync() still works when mounted -o async.
>
> If -o async means "all I/O is asyncronous except stuff explicitly
> fsync()ed" you're fine. Otherwise...
That's the way it works. Async is the default setting for most
filesystems, but fsync() is always honored, at last as far as
non-lying hardware will allow. :)
> The usual advice is to stick the WAL on a properly synced partition and
> stick the rest somewhere else. Note, I have no experience with this,
> it's just what I've heard.
This might not be optimal, as having every write synchronous actually
results in more synced writes than are strictly necessary.
-Doug
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
