So what do you suggest? -core vote and "order" someone to do the work?
Postgresql.org isn't a business and doesn't employ any developer - we
only have the option of accepting patches from people/companies with
itches.
I don't suggest any chance to any structures in place, it's a purely PR
point.
"That's important and we acknowledge the need."
Even in the absence of any progress on that item, a statement like this
sounds better to PHBs than
"If you need it, submit a patch."
Regards,
- Naz.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
