I'm doing something similar - using a control table, dropping and creating
the serial column and updating in a manner that does the job.
It works - barely. I am seeking a more elegent and stable method. Having a
simple update recognizing the row numbers (in version 1.6.1) would be
better - perhaps.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond O'Donnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
On 4 Dec 2006 at 15:40, Bob Pawley wrote:
When a row is deleted the serial number and oid are also deleted. The
sequence then has gaps which are inadmissible.
This is an issue which has come up at various times on this list in
the past - it may be worth having a look through the archives. Here's
one recent thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-08/msg00535.php
--Ray.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond O'Donnell
Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Galway, Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
