On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Thank you for comments. Attached updated patch. >>> >>> I see that Michael has marked this Ready for Committer, but also that >>> he didn't update the thread, so perhaps some interested committer >>> (Fujii Masao?) might have missed the fact that Michael thinks it's >>> ready to go. >> >> Sorry for not mentioning that directly on the thread. >> >>> Anyone interested in taking a look at this one for commit? >> >> I would assume that Fujii-san would be the chosen one here as he has >> worked already on the thread. > > No replies yet. So I am moving this patch to next CF.
After off-discussion with Fujii-san, I've updated the comment of why we should disallow interrupts before setting/cleanup the session-level lock. Please review it. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
fix_do_pg_abort_backup_v10.patch
Description: Binary data
