On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Michael Paquier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Michael Paquier >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Michael Paquier >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> I would just write "To >>>>>>> avoid calling CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS which can happen when releasing a >>>>>>> LWLock" and be done with it. There is no point to list a full function >>>>>>> dependency list, which could change in the future with static routines >>>>>>> of lwlock.c. >>>>> >>>>> Agreed. Updated the comment. >>>> >>>> Robert actually liked adding the complete routine list. Let's see what >>>> Fujii-san thinks at the end, there is still some time until the next >>>> round of minor releases. >>> >>> What I think is the patch I attached. Thought? >> >> That's OK for me. Thanks. > > +1 from me.
Committed. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
