On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Michael Paquier >>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Michael Paquier >>>>>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I would just write "To >>>>>>> avoid calling CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS which can happen when releasing a >>>>>>> LWLock" and be done with it. There is no point to list a full function >>>>>>> dependency list, which could change in the future with static routines >>>>>>> of lwlock.c. >>>>> >>>>> Agreed. Updated the comment. >>>> >>>> Robert actually liked adding the complete routine list. Let's see what >>>> Fujii-san thinks at the end, there is still some time until the next >>>> round of minor releases. >>> >>> What I think is the patch I attached. Thought? >> >> That's OK for me. Thanks. > > +1 from me.
Committed. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
