On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can we actually call it max_parallel_maintenance_workers instead? >> I mean we don't have work_mem_maintenance. > > Good point.
WFM. -- Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can we actually call it max_parallel_maintenance_workers instead? >> I mean we don't have work_mem_maintenance. > > Good point.
WFM. -- Peter Geoghegan