On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Can we actually call it max_parallel_maintenance_workers instead? > >> I mean we don't have work_mem_maintenance. > > > > Good point. > > WFM. > > This is good point. I agree with max_parallel_maintenance_workers. > -- > Peter Geoghegan > -- Rushabh Lathia
