Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Aargh. Will apply this patch break pg_upgrade from v10?
> AFAICS, it doesn't. Partitioned tables that used to have a TOAST
> table in v10 cluster will continue to have it after upgrading.
> Whereas, any partitioned tables created with the patched won't have a
> TOAST table.
Yeah, pg_upgrade already has to cope with cases where the newer version
thinks a table needs a toast table when the older version didn't, or
vice versa. This looks like it ought to fall into that category.
Not that testing it wouldn't be a good idea.
regards, tom lane
