On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2/20/18 23:04, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I think that crypto_hash.c or hash_crypt.c would be adapted as well. >> crypt.c is too much generic, so including both concepts in the name is >> the way to go. The name given by Tom here sounds actually nice. > > Updated patches
I have been reviewing both patches, and those look good to me. git diff --check has one complain: src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashes.c:170: new blank line at EOF. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
