On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'd be in favor of having some normally-ifdef'd-out facility for causing > failures of this kind. (As I mentioned upthread, I do not think "always > fail" is sufficient.) That's very different from having a user-visible > option, though. We don't expose a GUC that enables CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY, > to take a relevant example.
Sure. Feel free to propose something you like. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
