Hi, On 2018-01-20 14:51:12 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Finally found myself back at this one, because I still think this is a > problem we definitely need to adress (whether with this file or not).
This has an open CF entry for CF 2018-03. Given that there's still a lot of uncertainty what we want, I don't think that's a reasonable target. I would suggest moving it to 'returned with feedback'. Arguments against? - Andres
