On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was > marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new > version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then.
So, the way it's supposed to work is you resubmit the patch first and then re-activate the CF entry. If you get to re-activate the CF entry without actually updating the patch, and then submit the patch afterwards, then the CF deadline becomes largely meaningless. I think a new patch should rejected as untimely. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
