On 03/02/2018 09:21 PM, David Steele wrote: > On 3/2/18 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra >> <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was >>> marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new >>> version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then. >> >> So, the way it's supposed to work is you resubmit the patch first and >> then re-activate the CF entry. If you get to re-activate the CF entry >> without actually updating the patch, and then submit the patch >> afterwards, then the CF deadline becomes largely meaningless. I think >> a new patch should rejected as untimely. > > Hmmm, I missed that implication last night. I'll mark this Returned > with Feedback. > > Tomas, please move to the next CF once you have an updated patch. >
Can you guys please point me to the CF rules that say this? Because my understanding (and not just mine, AFAICS) was obviously different. Clearly there's a disconnect somewhere. -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services