Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-03-14 13:32:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> Only thing I wonder is if we shouldn't just *remove*
>>> ExplainPropertyLong and make ExplainPropertyInteger accept 64bits of
>>> input - the effort of passing and printing a 64bit integer will never be
>>> relevant for explain.
>> -0.5 ... everywhere else, we mean "int32" when we say "int", and I don't
>> think it's worth the potential confusion to do it differently here.
> So ExplainPropertyInt{32,64}?
I was thinking more of replacing ExplainPropertyLong with
ExplainPropertyInt64 and leaving ExplainPropertyInteger as-is.
Don't see the value in renaming that one just to rename it.
regards, tom lane
