John Naylor <jcnay...@gmail.com> writes: > It didn't take that long to rebase the remaining parts of the > patchset, so despite what I said above I went ahead and put them in > version 10 (attached), this time via scripted bulk editing rather than > as large patches.
Starting to look into this version now, but a small suggestion while it's still fresh in mind: it might be easier, in future rounds, to put all the files in a tarball and attach 'em as one big attachment. At least with my mail setup, it's way easier to save off a tarball and "tar xf" it than it is to individually save a dozen attachments. I suspect that way might be easier on your end, too. There's some value in posting a patchset as separate attachments when it's possible to just apply the patches in series; Munro's patch tester knows what to do with that, but not with a tarball AFAIK. But in this case, there's little hope that the patch tester would get it right anyhow. regards, tom lane