On 10/4/21, 8:19 PM, "Stephen Frost" <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > It's also been discussed, at least around the water cooler (as it were > in pandemic times- aka our internal slack channels..) that the existing > archive command might be reimplemented as an extension using these. Not > sure if that's really necessary but it was a thought. In any case, > thanks for working on this!
Interesting. I like the idea of having one code path for everything instead of branching for the hook and non-hook paths. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Nathan
