> On 22. 11. 2021, at 16:44, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 22.11.21 01:47, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> So I think just decoding the sequence tuples is a better solution - for >> large transactions (consuming many values from the sequence) it may be more >> expensive (i.e. send more records to replica). But I doubt that matters too >> much - it's likely negligible compared to other data for large transactions. > > I agree that the original approach is better. It was worth trying out this > alternative, but it seems quite complicated. I note that a lot of additional > code had to be added around several areas of the code, whereas the original > patch really just touched the logical decoding code, as it should. This > doesn't prevent anyone from attempting to optimize things somehow in the > future, but for now let's move forward with the simple approach.
+1 -- Petr Jelinek
