On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 4:48 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:55 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 2:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:19 AM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > As in, > > > > do we know of any replication (initial/streaming) misbehavior > > > > caused by the duplicate partition OIDs in this case or is the only > > > > problem that pg_publication_tables output looks odd? > > > > > > The latter one but I think either we should document this or change > > > it as we can't assume users will follow what subscriber-side code does. > > > > On second thought, I agree that de-duplicating partitions from this > > view is an improvement. > > > > Fair enough. Hou-San, Can you please submit the updated patch after fixing > any pending comments including the test case?
Attach the updated patch which address the comments so far. The patch only adds a testcase in publication.sql because the duplicate output doesn't cause unexpected behavior in pub-sub test. Best regards, Hou zj
v2-0001-de-duplicate-the-result-of-pg_get_publication_tables.patch
Description: v2-0001-de-duplicate-the-result-of-pg_get_publication_tables.patch
