On 1/6/22, 6:14 PM, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <sims...@amazon.com> wrote: > I am hesitant to make column name changes for obvious reasons, as it breaks > existing tooling. However, I think there is a really good case to change > "index_vacuum_count" as the name is confusing. > "index_vacuum_cycles_completed" is the name I suggest if we agree to rename. > > For the new column, "num_indexes_to_vacuum" is good with me.
Yeah, I think we can skip renaming index_vacuum_count for now. In any case, it would probably be good to discuss that in a separate thread. Nathan
