On 2022-03-16 18:50:23 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > First, let's be clear- we aren't actually talking about custom or > pluggable authentication here, at least when it comes to PG as a > project. For it to actually be pluggable, it needs to be supported on > both the client side and the server side, not just the server side. > > That this keeps getting swept under the carpet makes me feel like this > isn't actually an argument about the best way to move the PG project > forward but rather has another aim.
This is insulting and unjustified. IMO completely inappropriate for the list / community. I've also brought this up privately, but I thought it important to state so publically.
