On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 20:25, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > >> [New patch version pending] > > Do you have any objection if I rename the GUC to > recursive_worktable_factor? That seems a bit clearer as to what > it does, and it leaves more room for other knobs in the same area > if we decide we need any.
None, I think your proposal is a better name. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
